This post was prompted by John Galt at Robbing America, who has inspired a number of my posts over the last year. After I expressed a preference for Gary Johnson over Ron Paul, he suggested that I explain why.valium for sale
There are two parts to my answer. First I want to express that I have the utmost respect and admiration for both men. Either gives the country a chance at survival and recovery that far exceeds the other nominees from either of the two major parties. There are, however, a couple of differences that cause me to lean in Johnson’s direction.valium online pharmacy
First, there are a few minor substantive differences between the two, and I generally favor Johnson where they diverge.soma online without prescription
Second, Ron Paul is pursuing the GOP nomination, and Gary Johnson is pursuing the Libertarian nomination. One of the reasons I am a Libertarian is to defeat the irredeemable and hopelessly corrupt Republican Party. Gary Johnson is on the right team; Ron Paul is on a team that needs to be defeated.buy valium online without prescription
That said, let me move on to a more thorough discussion.buy klonopin online without prescription
Substantive Differences Between Johnson and Paulbuy ambien no prescription
Choosing between Johnson and Paul is no easy task. Both deserve strong “A” grades for their potential to pull the country out of its tailspin. Of the remaining candidates, I assess the following grades: Perry, C-; Santorum, D; Romney, D-; Gingrich, F; Obama, F-.buy tramadol online no prescription
So, it takes a very delicate instrument to decide who to prefer between the two candidates most qualified to be our next president (Johnson’s superior party choice notwithstanding).buy ativan without prescription
1) Track Record. Ron Paul has been the most influential Republican of the last quarter century. He has brought so many previously taboo subjects into the public view that it is astounding (e.g., the Federal Reserve and the Constitution). Without Paul the GOP would be completely indistinguishable from the Democratic Party. As of now they are merely kissing cousins.buy ambien online
But, Ron Paul hasn’t accomplished much in the way of getting legislation passed. He is an icon and (deservedly) a hero, but that has been more in the form of influence than tangible accomplishments.buy xanax online no prescription
Gary Johnson, on the other hand, was arguably the best Governor of the last fifty years. “Governor Veto” was the most fiscally conservative Governor in the U.S., and left New Mexico with a huge budget surplus. Yes, surplus. While their public roles have been different, Johnson’s track record as an elected official gives him a slight nod over Paul for the presidency in my opinion.buy xanax without prescription
2) The Liberal Libertarian. Gary Johnson is portraying himself as a “liberal libertarian.” Ron Paul is more of a “conservative libertarian.” To win the White House, a libertarian candidate must run right of the Republican and left of the Democrat.
Well, take the right-left spectrum, rotate it 90?, put the individual at the top, and state at the bottom. Johnson and Paul are in the rafters, while Romney and Obama are down in the statist basement. A libertarian must take “left-of-Democrat” positions in defense of individual liberties that statist Republicans cannot comprehend, such as ending the War on Drugs.
But, strategically, Johnson is making a point to push some of his more freedom-oriented liberal social views into the forefront of his campaign. Ron Paul is letting them lay in the shadows—which is unsurprising for someone trying to get the GOP nomination. As a libertarian, however, I like to see a candidate explain how libertarians are different from the two political flavors the media pretends represent the whole political menu. Johnson does a better job, in my humble opinion, and I support him for that.
3) Presence. Stage presence is not a strong suit of either Johnson or Paul. Paul tends to get hyper. Johnson needs to get more inspirational. All told, however, I prefer Johnson’s calm, direct approach. It may not serve him well at campaign rallies, but it served him well as a Governor, and will serve him well as president.
4) Reputation. Ron Paul’s ferocious defense of classical liberal/libertarian principles has not only gained him a cadre of loyal followers, it has also gained him bitter enemies within the GOP. He has been called a “kook” thousands of times over the decades by his supposed allies. Some Republicans in Congress have gone so far as to say he should join the Democratic Party. Maybe he should have—Democrats don’t abuse their party mates the way Republicans do.
Anyhow, Gary Johnson comes with a clean slate. He comes with a reputation as one of the most successful Governors in recent history. In other words, Johnson doesn’t come with the reputational baggage that Ron Paul has. Dr. Paul doesn’t deserve this animosity—he deserves applause—but I’m working within the context of political realities here.
Johnson and the Libertarian Party
The second reason I support Gary Johnson over Ron Paul is because Dr. Paul is on the wrong team, and the Governor is on the right team.
Let me reiterate why I want to see the GOP defeated. The Republican Party is a corrupt, top-down money laundering operation. The LP is a grassroots-based organization, with power centered at the local level. The Republican establishment wants you to vote one day every two years, and to be quiet the other 729. The LP wants you—indeed needs you—to have a say all 730.
So, while I am supportive of Dr. Paul’s quest for the GOP nomination, it is unlikely that he will have any substantive impact on the Republican Party’s flawed architecture. If Johnson wins, however, a political party with a vastly superior bottom-up structure will have prevailed, which would be an enormous victory for the broader liberty movement. (It also is a good reason for anyone who claims to favor freedom and free markets needs to give Johnson serious consideration.)
So, the bottom line is, do you want Karl Rove and Katie Couric choosing your candidates? Or do you want to choose your candidates? If you prefer the former, stick with the GOP. If you prefer the latter, consider the LP.
When it comes to the substantive differences between Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, I lean ever-so-slightly in Johnson’s favor. When it comes to their party allegiances, however, I lean heavily Johnson’s way.
And when Ron Paul finally concedes, to all his supporters, welcome aboard!
This article is also posted at The Country Thinker.