<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama To Ask For $1.5 Trillion In New Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/</link>
	<description>Above all else, in search of the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18188</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No need for me to be patient, Bill. I think your comment is very germaine to the topic.It provides a good background for exactly why it is so dangerous to allow our government the proverbial inch. Once they have that inch, it inevitably grows to a mile and beyond. The 16th Amendment allowed them to do just that, as we have seen with ever growing amount of taxation.

What&#039;s even more troubling to me is the fact that the tax increases being sought by President Obama will be used to do exactly as you have warned. He will pay off the unions by creating more government jobs, instead of jobs that would actually benefit our country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need for me to be patient, Bill. I think your comment is very germaine to the topic.It provides a good background for exactly why it is so dangerous to allow our government the proverbial inch. Once they have that inch, it inevitably grows to a mile and beyond. The 16th Amendment allowed them to do just that, as we have seen with ever growing amount of taxation.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more troubling to me is the fact that the tax increases being sought by President Obama will be used to do exactly as you have warned. He will pay off the unions by creating more government jobs, instead of jobs that would actually benefit our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18187</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all, it&#039;s only your civic duty to want to pay taxes. You should feel honored that they want you to pay more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After all, it&#8217;s only your civic duty to want to pay taxes. You should feel honored that they want you to pay more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trestin</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18180</link>
		<dc:creator>Trestin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was hoping they would raise my taxes, 60% of my income gone in various forms of taxation is just not enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping they would raise my taxes, 60% of my income gone in various forms of taxation is just not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18162</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[taxes yeah; but not without representation right? that and the desire to worship as we pleased were the two
uniquely american truisms that built colonial concensus against mr. george the third. and so in 1776 we
&#039;declared&#039; the king could bug off and we shed a lot of patriotic blood during the following decade to establish our &#039;cred&#039;. we won our soveriegnty, but we needed a &#039;magna carta&#039;; a set of rules to govern, and so we fashioned the &#039;constitution in 1787 and officially became a &#039;representative republic&#039;. and that is when the &#039;yet to be invented&#039; rubber met the road, &#039;cause after the celebration was over our newly elected congress understood that to fufill it&#039;s
constitutional duties to provide for the defense of our nation, guarantee our individual liberty and provide for the &#039;common&#039; good; it had to pass legislation that would &#039;procure&#039; revenue for the federal coffers, our first &#039;taxes&#039;.

and they were benign and righteous over the next century. the lion&#039;s share coming from &#039;tarrifs&#039;, and the balance in &#039;excise&#039; taxes for alchohol and tobacco. the states kept their ledgers balanced through &#039;property&#039; taxes and redundent excise, alchohol and tobacco. everyone was blissed out except the importers/exporters and the
indulgent. this period in our history i think of as our &#039;camelot&#039; days with regard to taxation and i thank you again
mr. jackson for your patience; but i felt i had to provide a contrasting back-ground to our current situation.  

here&#039;s where my comment becomes germaine to the topic:
prior to 1913 and the passage of the 16th amendment; &#039;direct taxation&#039; of the people was an experiment of the late 1900&#039;s yeilding little federal revenue; but mr. wilson&#039;s administration put the 16th on steroids. what began as 1% to 7% under the amendment jumped to 67% at the top in 1917. today&#039;s progressives would wet their pants if they could re-create that scenario.

today mr. obama officially declared &#039;war&#039; on the top earners. he advocates a &#039;marginal&#039; increase on their income;
he doesn&#039;t specify the percentage, it doesn&#039;t matter. any &#039;tax&#039; increase is a soporific to his base. there is also no guarantee that the increased revenue will be used to &#039;pay down&#039; our debt. there is every indication that any increased funding will provide this administration the means to initiate  the &#039;temporary&#039; hiring of more union employees and thus augment his re-election support. and his speech plays to the populist feeling that the &#039;rich&#039;
have more and so they should give something back. &#039;they already do&#039;. i&#039;m not referring to the hedge fund kings or the off-shore companies that dis-placed american workers; they need to be held to task, but we can&#039;t begin to right the wrongs on our economy &#039;till we address our productivity. we used to &#039;make things&#039; that we needed and the rest world wanted. some folks say it&#039;s a different time and we live in a &#039;global&#039; economy. yeah it is, but people all over
the world still want &#039;stuff&#039;. so let&#039;s give the world &#039;american&#039; products at a competitive cost. allow the off-shore companies a real incentive to bring their factories and hiring back home. that would increase the federal tax revenue and cut our un-employment by half. raising &#039;direct taxation&#039; is historically a last resort and i see no need
for that now; unless we are no longer free within the bounds of our &#039;1776 declaration&#039; to determine our individual right to liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...b]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taxes yeah; but not without representation right? that and the desire to worship as we pleased were the two<br />
uniquely american truisms that built colonial concensus against mr. george the third. and so in 1776 we<br />
&#8216;declared&#8217; the king could bug off and we shed a lot of patriotic blood during the following decade to establish our &#8216;cred&#8217;. we won our soveriegnty, but we needed a &#8216;magna carta&#8217;; a set of rules to govern, and so we fashioned the &#8216;constitution in 1787 and officially became a &#8216;representative republic&#8217;. and that is when the &#8216;yet to be invented&#8217; rubber met the road, &#8217;cause after the celebration was over our newly elected congress understood that to fufill it&#8217;s<br />
constitutional duties to provide for the defense of our nation, guarantee our individual liberty and provide for the &#8216;common&#8217; good; it had to pass legislation that would &#8216;procure&#8217; revenue for the federal coffers, our first &#8216;taxes&#8217;.</p>
<p>and they were benign and righteous over the next century. the lion&#8217;s share coming from &#8216;tarrifs&#8217;, and the balance in &#8216;excise&#8217; taxes for alchohol and tobacco. the states kept their ledgers balanced through &#8216;property&#8217; taxes and redundent excise, alchohol and tobacco. everyone was blissed out except the importers/exporters and the<br />
indulgent. this period in our history i think of as our &#8216;camelot&#8217; days with regard to taxation and i thank you again<br />
mr. jackson for your patience; but i felt i had to provide a contrasting back-ground to our current situation.  </p>
<p>here&#8217;s where my comment becomes germaine to the topic:<br />
prior to 1913 and the passage of the 16th amendment; &#8216;direct taxation&#8217; of the people was an experiment of the late 1900&#8242;s yeilding little federal revenue; but mr. wilson&#8217;s administration put the 16th on steroids. what began as 1% to 7% under the amendment jumped to 67% at the top in 1917. today&#8217;s progressives would wet their pants if they could re-create that scenario.</p>
<p>today mr. obama officially declared &#8216;war&#8217; on the top earners. he advocates a &#8216;marginal&#8217; increase on their income;<br />
he doesn&#8217;t specify the percentage, it doesn&#8217;t matter. any &#8216;tax&#8217; increase is a soporific to his base. there is also no guarantee that the increased revenue will be used to &#8216;pay down&#8217; our debt. there is every indication that any increased funding will provide this administration the means to initiate  the &#8216;temporary&#8217; hiring of more union employees and thus augment his re-election support. and his speech plays to the populist feeling that the &#8216;rich&#8217;<br />
have more and so they should give something back. &#8216;they already do&#8217;. i&#8217;m not referring to the hedge fund kings or the off-shore companies that dis-placed american workers; they need to be held to task, but we can&#8217;t begin to right the wrongs on our economy &#8217;till we address our productivity. we used to &#8216;make things&#8217; that we needed and the rest world wanted. some folks say it&#8217;s a different time and we live in a &#8216;global&#8217; economy. yeah it is, but people all over<br />
the world still want &#8216;stuff&#8217;. so let&#8217;s give the world &#8216;american&#8217; products at a competitive cost. allow the off-shore companies a real incentive to bring their factories and hiring back home. that would increase the federal tax revenue and cut our un-employment by half. raising &#8216;direct taxation&#8217; is historically a last resort and i see no need<br />
for that now; unless we are no longer free within the bounds of our &#8217;1776 declaration&#8217; to determine our individual right to liberty, and the pursuit of happiness&#8230;b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18160</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are exactly right, until they get serious about cutting spending they shouldn&#039;t even talk about raising taxes. If they simply raise taxes all it will mean is that they have more money to spend and I think we all know that means they will spend more money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are exactly right, until they get serious about cutting spending they shouldn&#8217;t even talk about raising taxes. If they simply raise taxes all it will mean is that they have more money to spend and I think we all know that means they will spend more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18156</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is stuck on the same mantra, that&#039;s for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is stuck on the same mantra, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18155</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than rarely, I would say. Their actions speak much louder than their words and those actions make it plain that they are not interested in real and substantive spending cuts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than rarely, I would say. Their actions speak much louder than their words and those actions make it plain that they are not interested in real and substantive spending cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18154</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t argue with a single thing you have listed, Harry. One reason we have not seen our deficit and debt go down is because they are not cutting spending in real dollars. It&#039;s always &quot;over ten years&quot; or words to that effect. Translated, that means they aren&#039;t really going to cut spending, but they are playing the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t argue with a single thing you have listed, Harry. One reason we have not seen our deficit and debt go down is because they are not cutting spending in real dollars. It&#8217;s always &#8220;over ten years&#8221; or words to that effect. Translated, that means they aren&#8217;t really going to cut spending, but they are playing the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18153</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just heard the President pushing his new tax plan and he is very adamant that it isn&#039;t class warfare, but I don&#039;t know what else you could call it. He is coming right out in the open with it, not trying to hide it at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard the President pushing his new tax plan and he is very adamant that it isn&#8217;t class warfare, but I don&#8217;t know what else you could call it. He is coming right out in the open with it, not trying to hide it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim at Conservatives on Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/#comment-18149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim at Conservatives on Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=7006#comment-18149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is a broken record. If he is not playing the class warfare card he is playing the race card. He does not want to unite America. He wants to split America apart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a broken record. If he is not playing the class warfare card he is playing the race card. He does not want to unite America. He wants to split America apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-to-ask-for-1-5-trillion-in-new-taxes/feed/ ) in 2.31496 seconds, on May 22nd, 2013 at 4:46 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2013 at 5:46 am UTC -->