BadBlue – My News Aggregator Of Choice


Obama Lied About NSA Spying Program

NSASince the time the world learned how the NSA was conducting a massive program to intercept communications, phone calls, emails, etc., President Obama has assured there was no problem. He told us we need to trust the government to do the right thing, to get the balance right between protecting our country and protecting the privacy of American citizens. Not that I have ever trusted President Obama, but the more we learn, the more the distrust builds. There is a lot we are not being told about the way our government is operating.

klonopin online no prescription

For instance, did you know that the Bush administration made a specific request of the court that oversees the NSA’s spying program? They wanted to place a ban on the government being able to search specifically for American’s communications inside the database built up by the NSA. FISC granted that request and implemented the ban. That was in 2008, again at the request of the Bush administration. Did you also know that the ban has been lifted, this time in response to a request by the Obama administration? I thought not, as President Obama has not been forthcoming with that information. Hat tip to Doug Ross.

ambien online no prescription

Washington Post – The Obama administration secretly won permission from a surveillance court in 2011 to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agency’s use of intercepted phone calls and e-mails, permitting the agency to search deliberately for Americans’ communications in its massive databases, according to interviews with government officials and recently declassified material.

buy phentermine online without prescription

In addition, the court extended the length of time that the NSA is allowed to retain intercepted U.S. communications from five years to six years — and more under special circumstances, according to the documents, which include a recently released 2011 opinion by U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, then chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

buy valium online without prescription

What had not been previously acknowledged is that the court in 2008 imposed an explicit ban — at the government’s request — on those kinds of searches, that officials in 2011 got the court to lift the bar and that the search authority has been used.

buy tramadol no prescription

Together the permission to search and to keep data longer expanded the NSA’s authority in significant ways without public debate or any specific authority from Congress. The administration’s assurances rely on legalistic definitions of the term “target” that can be at odds with ordinary English usage. The enlarged authority is part of a fundamental shift in the government’s approach to surveillance: collecting first, and protecting Americans’ privacy later.

buy klonopin online

“The government says, ‘We’re not targeting U.S. persons,’ ” said Gregory T. Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology. “But then they never say, ‘We turn around and deliberately search for Americans’ records in what we took from the wire.’ That, to me, is not so different from targeting Americans at the outset.”

valium for sale

Tell me again how we should trust the Obama administration.

ativan online no prescription

This is another example of President Obama speaking with a forked tongue. He speaks with great platitudes, but his actions are something else entirely. He tells us we need to trust our government, but at his administration’s specific request, the NSA is now allowed to search for our phone calls, emails, text messages, etc. in the communications it has collected. I guess that doesn’t constitute a targeting of Americans by their own government. Their twisting of the definitions of certain words in the English language defies logic.

buy xanax online

I would really like to find something else to write about. It would be easy to get depressed, thinking about all the things the government is doing behind our backs. Not that I am naive enough to not know every administration does some things under the cover of secrecy, but President Obama declared his administration would be the most open and honest administration in American history. Instead, we have an administration completely devoted to secrecy. Their claim of openness and honesty is a joke that has been perpetrated upon the American people. I don’t know about you, but I’m not finding that to be so funny.

About LD Jackson

buy valium online

LD Jackson has written 2053 posts in this blog.

buy valium online

Founder and author of the political and news commentary blog Political Realities. I have always loved to write, but never have I felt my writing was more important than in this present day. If I have changed one mind or impressed one American about the direction our country is headed, then I will consider my endeavors a success. I take the tag line on this blog very seriously. Above all else, in search of the truth.

One Pingback/Trackback

  • Too many people just listen to what he says and don’t watch what he does. The platitudes are all they know and they are happy with him in their ignorance.

    • To think so many people could be fooled by his platitudes is troubling. We have no one to blame for this but ourselves, speaking of the American public in general. We are our own worst enemy by looking at and listening to the wrong things.

  • Who ever first used the refrain: if his lips are moving, he’s lying, must have had someone like Barack Obama in mind. If he ever tried to tell the truth he would probably stutter.

    • I couldn’t agree more. He lies more than he tells the truth.

  • Unfortunately none of this is surprising. It appears all of our communications are subject to government snooping. It begs the question whether the administration used the information obtained by the NSA for use against political opponents in the run up to the 2012 election. We know the IRS was used in this manner, was the NSA as well?

    • That’s a good question. Given Obama’s past willingness to use the workings of the Chicago government against his political opponents, I can’t help but think the answer would be affirmative.

  • bobmontgomery

    I don’t know the language of the original legislation establishing the FISA court, but I’m pretty sure it was intended to assist the intelligence and prosecutorial agencies in finding terrorists, not in allowing for the casting of wide nets. If it wrote blank checks, absent probable cause, then not only Obama officials but the court itself is guilty of violating the 4th Amendment. Original intent allows for new technology, but the intent remains valid. Gentlemen do not read other gentlemen’s mail. Terrorists are not gentlemen, but the 4th Amendment says you have to tell the judge who, what, where and why.

    • But, it’s much easier for the government to cast the wide net and sift through the information later. The original intent was to find and stop terrorists, which is admirable. However, that intent has been twisted into something that goes completely against the 4th Amendment.

      I’ll just have to beg forgiveness, because I do not trust this administration. Not in the least.

  • Obama will have the full background on all GOP candidates without a doubt. It’s the Chicago way.

  • Pingback: Obama Lied About NSA Spying Program | Grumpy Opinions()

  • Another example of Obama saying one thing while doing another, is it any wonder so many people distrust our government right now? Luckily for Obama he has Syria to distract the American people from this scandal.

    • Truly, he speaks out of both sides of his mouth and with a forked tongue.