<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mormon church reversal on gay rights?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/mormon-church-reversal-on-gay-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/mormon-church-reversal-on-gay-rights/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Above all else, in search of the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LD Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/mormon-church-reversal-on-gay-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator>LD Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=2268#comment-5427</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment on Political Realities, Charles. Do you have a link to your blog?

I just felt like the Mormon church was getting a bad rap on this one and I have a sense of fair play that I can not ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment on Political Realities, Charles. Do you have a link to your blog?</p>
<p>I just felt like the Mormon church was getting a bad rap on this one and I have a sense of fair play that I can not ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Pink Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/mormon-church-reversal-on-gay-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-5421</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Pink Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=2268#comment-5421</guid>
		<description>I think that I hold the same basic position as you on gay marriage, I oppose it because I feel that marriage is first and foremost a religious institution. But I understand that marriage comes with certain legal benefits and I think that by granting gay couples civil unions it provides them with the same legal benefits as marriage, so that is more acceptable to me.
 You wrote the following paragraph:

Widely misunderstood, their support of Proposition 8 had nothing to do with discriminating against homosexuals and everything to do with protecting the sanctity of what should be a union between a man and a woman. By supporting the ordinances in Salt Lake City, I believe they are showing they want nothing to do with discrimination and that they can be supportive of non-discriminatory legislation that does not include marriage rights.

  I think that sums it up perfectly and I agree. The Mormon church is against discrimination even against people with whom they disagree. They can support anti-discrimination legislation and be opposed to gay marriage at the same time.
.-= Mr Pink Eyes&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/11/12/alaska-senator-says-he-is-not-aware-of-any-provision-in-the-constitution-that-gives-the-government-the-authority-to-mandate-healthcare-coverage/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alaska senator says he is not aware of any provision in the constitution that gives the government the authority to mandate healthcare coverage&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that I hold the same basic position as you on gay marriage, I oppose it because I feel that marriage is first and foremost a religious institution. But I understand that marriage comes with certain legal benefits and I think that by granting gay couples civil unions it provides them with the same legal benefits as marriage, so that is more acceptable to me.<br />
 You wrote the following paragraph:</p>
<p>Widely misunderstood, their support of Proposition 8 had nothing to do with discriminating against homosexuals and everything to do with protecting the sanctity of what should be a union between a man and a woman. By supporting the ordinances in Salt Lake City, I believe they are showing they want nothing to do with discrimination and that they can be supportive of non-discriminatory legislation that does not include marriage rights.</p>
<p>  I think that sums it up perfectly and I agree. The Mormon church is against discrimination even against people with whom they disagree. They can support anti-discrimination legislation and be opposed to gay marriage at the same time.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Mr Pink Eyes&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/11/12/alaska-senator-says-he-is-not-aware-of-any-provision-in-the-constitution-that-gives-the-government-the-authority-to-mandate-healthcare-coverage/" rel="nofollow">Alaska senator says he is not aware of any provision in the constitution that gives the government the authority to mandate healthcare coverage</a> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Krebs</title>
		<link>http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/mormon-church-reversal-on-gay-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Krebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldjackson.net/?p=2268#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>Great comments about the LDS stance on defending gay rights. I am LDS and came across your article while trying to do my own blog on the arguments that are occuring due to the church&#039;s stance on Gay marriage and other related topics. I&#039;ll probably be reading some more of your stuff soon. Thanks for the favorable outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments about the LDS stance on defending gay rights. I am LDS and came across your article while trying to do my own blog on the arguments that are occuring due to the church&#8217;s stance on Gay marriage and other related topics. I&#8217;ll probably be reading some more of your stuff soon. Thanks for the favorable outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
