In essence, the “virtually” the same Act would change something within a law already enacted. At any stage of development a fetus is not viable, that is the difference between the two and an Act that is passed that protects pre-viable fetuses would in essence ban first trimester abortions. Roe vs. Wade states that a state has no controlling interest in a fetus until after the first trimester and then the state has the right to restrict abortions. Roe also states the decision to abort at this stage of development is a choice made between a woman and her doctor. This is why Obama voted against it. He is not a “baby killer”, he is moreso in favor of protecting rights that are already law.