IRS Oversteps Its Authority – Targets Tea Party

In a move that raised concerns for many people across our country, including the members of the Tea Party, the Internal Revenue Service has sent a letter requesting information from Tea Party chapters that clearly overreached its authority. The specific instance I am referring to has to do with the application of the Waco Tea Party to register as a 501(c)(4) non-profit group. I was first alerted to this by a post from The McCarville Report Online and when I read it, I couldn’t believe what I was reading. Well, actually, I am not surprised at anything the IRS does, but it dismays me that they would go so far to control what certain groups can or can not do. The link I have provided is to Mike McCarville’s short opinion piece about the actions of the IRS. The original story comes from Fox News and it should give us all reason for concern.

In letters sent from IRS offices in Cincinnati earlier this month, chapters including the Waco (Texas) Tea Party and the Ohio Liberty Council were asked to provide a list of donors, identify volunteers, financial support for and relationships with political candidates and parties, and even printed copies of their Facebook pages.

“Some of what they (the IRS) asked was reasonable, but there were some requests on there that were strange,” Toby Marie Walker, president of the Waco Tea Party told “It makes you wonder if they do this to groups like ACORN or other left-leaning groups.”

You can read the letter the IRS sent to the Waco chapter of the Tea Party here, but I want to quote a portion of the demands the IRS made.

1.  Please provide copies of your current web pages, including your Blog posts. Please provide copies of all of your newsletters, bulletins, flyers, newsletters or any other media or literature you have disseminated to your members or others. Please provide copies of stories and articles you have published about you.

2.  Provide copies of the pages of your social networking sites.

Did you read what they are wanting? I believe this brings us to an entirely new chapter of government overreach, by one of its most powerful departments. This should be enough to convince anyone that the IRS needs to be reformed. By reform, I mean it needs to be hamstrung, if not abolished and closed completely down. The first two items on their list is just the start of a list of demands. While some of them may be normal, I fail to see why they need copies of web pages, social networking sites, or blog posts. Just to approve a 501(c)(4) request?

Some of the other demands include the IRS’ desire to know if the Waco Tea Party has endorsed any political candidates, and if so, they want specific instances and the circumstances surrounding those endorsements. It should be noted here that a 501(c)(4) differs from a 501(c)(3), in that they are allowed to participate in specific campaigns and to endorse candidates. If that is the case, according to IRS rules, why does the IRS need to know who they have endorsed and why? Here is the portion of the letter that makes that demand.

8.  Have you expressly endorsed or oppose candidates for public office or slates of candidates at public events, on your website, on your radio show or You Tube page, in your literature or any other forum? Do you plan to do so in the current election cycle? If so, provide a list of candidates for political office yo have expressly endorsed or opposed, and describe the occasion on which you made each endorsement.

9.  Describe in detail any financial or other support you have given to candidates, slates of candidates, or political parties, or which you plan to give in the current election cycle.

Are you getting worried now? If you aren’t, you should be. I am not a fan or a believer of conspiracy theories, but the IRS has clearly overstepped its authority in this case. Given the nature of their demands, it should also make us realize that those of us who blog about all things political are definitely on their radar. What more will it take to make us realize the direction our government is headed?

About LD Jackson

LD Jackson has written 2048 posts in this blog.

Founder and author of the political and news commentary blog Political Realities. I have always loved to write, but never have I felt my writing was more important than in this present day. If I have changed one mind or impressed one American about the direction our country is headed, then I will consider my endeavors a success. I take the tag line on this blog very seriously. Above all else, in search of the truth.

  • Jim at Conservatives on Fire

    Intimidation is the tool of choice of the IRS. It seems clear that politics is what is motivating them If so, this is very dangerous game the Obama administration is playing.

    • LD Jackson

      I would like to sit down with whoever wrote that letter and came up with the requirements. Many of them have nothing to do with the original application to be classified as a 501(c)(4). There is clearly a different kind of motivation for this.

  • Kurt Silverfiddle

    The Obama political corruption machine turns more Nixonian by the day…

    • LD Jackson

      It seems you are right. I can’t help but wonder what they will come up with next.

  • MattRoss

    Wow, and with all the shenanigans of the Media Matters coming out, they’re going after the Tea Party instead? 

    Of course they are! 

    • LD Jackson

      I would expect nothing less, but it is still ridiculous. The federal government, including the IRS, needs to get their priorities on straight.

  • Steve Dennis

    This is very worrisome Larry! The IRS has clearly overstepped its authority and with the power and might they have to destroy a person it could be conceived that they are being used to intimidate opponents of the Obama administration. We should all be very worried about this.

    • LD Jackson

      I can think of no other reason, Steve. Why else would they be interested in blog posts and social networking pages? They clearly want to know what these groups think and who they are endorsing, even though it is completely legal for them to endorse candidates.

  • theCL

    Of course they’re out to destroy “unapproved” opinion.

    I am not a fan or a believer of conspiracy theories …

    People are charged and convicted in court of conspiracy all the time. In other words, people do conspire and sometimes in bad ways. Knowing both human nature and history, is it really so crazy to suspect those wielding power over us conspire to do things against our best interests?

    All too often we’re willing to slap a law together to punish our neighbors for doing something minor we don’t like. Yet we’re not even willing to be suspicious of our rulers motives, let alone punish them severely for outright criminal acts. Especially when they’re on “our team.” Can politicians and bureaucrats opt-out of the moral code the rest of us are expected to live by?

    As Lord Acton famously said, “power corrupts.” We need to stop kidding ourselves about the motives behind acts such as this, and move ever more boldly against them.

    • LD Jackson

       I sincerely believe we the people are part of the problem. We have went along with the status quo, with the powers that be, for so long, most of us haven’t a clue how to do anything else. If we had exercised our power at the voting booth many years ago, we would not be in the mess we are in right now.

  • theCL

    I sincerely believe we the people are part of the problem.

    I totally agree.

    The primary reason why is, I believe, our naive faith in politicians and the institution they represent. We too often busy ourselves prattling on about bad legislation and unintended consequences, when the reality of the problem is that our elected officials are acting on bad intentions.

    Conspiracy … To say that people conspire to do bad things is hardly controversial. Yet when someone says that politicians and government bureaucrats have/are conspiring to do something against or best interests, they magically turn into a laughing stock.

    Take the 9/11 truthers for example. Now, I happen to disagree with much of their analysis and believe they draw the wrong conclusions. I disagree with them. But is that reason enough to hate them, disassociate with them, and/or declare them to be subhuman lunatics? Of course not. Nor is it enough for anyone else, as witnessed daily on the Internet.

    What really makes people so raving mad at truthers? The very idea that officials in our own government could have been involved. Blasphemy! How dare our Overlords be questioned.

    Antiwar? Gasp! Atheists can say the darnedest things without suffering the kind of abuse and ridicule heaped upon Americans against the wars.

    The Civic Religion has replaced genuine religion. It has become a mortal, unforgivable sin to speak, or even think, disparagingly about Our Government.

    The Federal Reserve Act, written and pushed by the country’s largest most influential bankers, passed in the dark of the night on Christmas Eve, when almost nobody was around to vote. Travel was hard in those days. Sounds like a “conspiracy” doesn’t it? And it is! But …

    Think all the way back to 2009 … when ObamaCare was passed in the dark of the night on Christmas Eve. Of course ObamaCare was a bill supported and agitated for by the country’s largest insurance companies and drug manufacturers. Hmmmm … Suddenly the Fed story doesn’t sound so fishy after all. It’s not. That’s how it happened.

    Was ObamaCare also a conspiracy? Yes. Of course it was.

    See what I’m getting at?