BadBlue – My News Aggregator Of Choice


E-Cigarettes – Public Health Crisis Or Smoker’s Friend

This will be one of those posts where my inner libertarian comes closer to the surface. When I see our governments, both local, state, and federal, begin to interject itself into an issue where it should be limited, I can’t help but wonder why they are traveling this route. Case in point would be e-cigarettes.

klonopin online no prescription

E-CigarettesI venture into this arena with little or not technical or scientific expertise. I know nothing about e-cigarettes except what I have learned from my own research and from watching some of the people I am around during my daily work. At least two men I work with use e-cigarettes. One of them has completely stopped smoking real cigarettes and the other is working on his own complete cessation. I have been around both of them while they are puffing vapors from their e-cigarettes and I can tell you, first hand, there is no such unpleasant stench as is the case with a real cigarette. Both of these men will tell you their e-cigarettes have been good for them.

ambien online no prescription

Scientifically, there is no real proof that the vapors from e-cigarettes are harmful to those who are near when the vapors are inhaled and exhaled. Given what we know about secondhand smoke from real cigarettes, and the tests that have been performed on the vapors that are produced by e-cigarettes, there is every indication that these vapors are, in fact, far less harmful than secondhand smoke. Why, then do our governments seem so intent on banning something that has proven, to more than a few smokers, to be helpful in stopping smoking habits that have spanned decades?

buy phentermine online without prescription

I often wonder if our governments, again, local, state, and federal, are suffering from a insecurity crisis. They want to be “useful” to us, their constituents, so they often do things that work to secure that usefulness. I can not help but wonder if e-cigarettes are not a prime example of government creating a job for itself. This is apparent all over the country, even in conservative Oklahoma. You see, Governor Mary Fallin recently issued an executive order banning the use of e-cigarettes on state property. Here is some of her reasoning behind that order.

buy valium online without prescription

The McCarville Report – Documents attempting to explain Governor Fallin’s executive order banning e-cigarettes on state property contain bizarre reasons for the ban.

buy tramadol no prescription


buy klonopin online

First, the documents claim their vapor is harmful but admit “much more research is needed” to make a determination.

valium for sale

Second, the documents assert it is necessary because they “look like traditional cigarettes.”

ativan online no prescription

So the ban is based on little research and the way e-cigarettes look.

buy xanax online

Here’s what the state document says:

buy valium online

Why can’t e-cigarettes and vapor products be used on state property? Isn’t the vapor just water vapor?

buy valium online

There are two primary concerns related to the use of vapor products outdoors on state property. First, these products are relatively new, and much more research is needed on the potential impact for users and bystanders. Research has shown that the vapor is notjust water vapor – ecigarettes and vapor products still release nicotine and toxic chemicals into the air. Citizens in Oklahoma have come to expect clean air in most places, and the use of ecigarettes and vapor products results in less clean air than currently experienced on state property.

The second concern is related to social norms and public perception of smoking prevalence. Many ecigarettes look like traditional cigarettes and emit a vapor that looks like traditional cigarette smoke. Research shows that teens that see tobacco use in their homes or public places in their community may come to see smoking as a normal part of adult behavior. Since many state agencies offer services to families and youth, it is important to maintain social norms that protect youth from exposure to tobacco use of any kind on state property or by state employees while providing services to Oklahomans.

Mike McCarville is not the only person questioning the wisdom and reasoning behind Governor Fallin’s decision to ban e-cigarettes on state property. There is also the question of the implicit recommendation for harmful drugs that are used to help some people stop smoking. Couple that with the fact that Fallin’s order is based, in part, on a very suspect interpretation of a research study on e-cigarettes performed by the Oklahoma State Department of Health.

AxXiom for Liberty – One faulty point that Fallin uses to justify the need for a ban is the result of an embarrassing misreading of existing e-cigarette research by the Oklahoma State Department of Health.  Executive Order 2013-43 states that secondary e-cigarette vapor contains formaldehyde.


The actual research that the Oklahoma State Department of Health is basing this claim on (see footnotes for their sources) did show a minute increase in formaldehyde that began when the subjects entered the testing room and BEFORE they even began using the e-cigarette.

In the study cited by OSDH the researchers themselves note that the increase in formaldehyde might be caused by the person in the chamber itself, because people are known to exhale formaldehyde in low amounts”

If you want to know more about this, Dr. Farsalinos, a Greek cardiologist and researcher does a great job covering the actual findings of the German study that Fallin and the OSDH are basing their formaldehyde claims on here.

There is one other reason why I suspect e-cigarettes are under attack by governments everywhere. In the midst of a long piece by The Huffington Post, I found this piece of information. Listed as one of nine terribly disturbing things about e-cigarettes is the fact that they are not taxed in the same manner as normal cigarettes. It is no big secret that the tobacco companies are taxed in extraordinary fashion. I suppose this is how they must pay for their sins against public health. Is it possible that some governments see e-cigarettes as a threat to their coffers? Maybe they are seeking to be proactive in their search for new fees and taxes to increase their funding?

In no way am I condoning smoking cigarettes, electronic or real. I believe the Bible teaches a person to be careful about what they allow in their bodies. Smoking tobacco, especially with the additives that are inserted in the manufacturing process, has been proven to be harmful to your health. The nicotine contained in e-cigarettes is a poison to the human body and can be fatal in small doses. There is substantial proof, however, that e-cigarettes have been helpful for some smokers to stop smoking completely. If that works for them, then I see e-cigarettes as a helpful tool.

This is where my inner libertarian comes to the surface. I believe the Bible teaches us against smoking, drinking alcohol, and even overeating. This is because of the harm that all of them can do to the human body. I also believe in personal liberty and freedom. A person should be free to choose what we do with their body. God even allows that. He does not force us to abide by his rules. We are given choices and will face the consequences of those choices in the judgement. Should government not, at least, give us the same choice?

I can fully understand the decision that has been made to ban smoking tobacco products in so many public places. Secondhand smoke is a real and viable danger to public health. Extending the ban to e-cigarettes makes me wonder what the real motive is behind the attack on e-cigarettes. All of this is food for thought. I am more than a little interested to hear what you, my readers, have to say on this burgeoning issue.

About LD Jackson

LD Jackson has written 2053 posts in this blog.

Founder and author of the political and news commentary blog Political Realities. I have always loved to write, but never have I felt my writing was more important than in this present day. If I have changed one mind or impressed one American about the direction our country is headed, then I will consider my endeavors a success. I take the tag line on this blog very seriously. Above all else, in search of the truth.

One Pingback/Trackback

  • I’m not sure if there’s enough info on e-cigarettes yet. Until more is known I’m not opposed to the Governor banning them on state property. If the main objection to the ban is that the vapor is not harmful to others then I would wonder why there was no furor when the Governor banned the use of smokeless tobacco along with cigarettes on state property.

    • It just feels like Governor Fallin is falling into the way of thinking that preaches government is the answer to all our problems. That it has to be responsible for our well being. As much as I do not like the habit of smoking, for personal and religious reasons, I hesitate to get behind such a ban. It seems like overkill to me.

  • Everything is a crisis isn’t it? If people want to smoke, it’s none of the government’s business. If private business wants to allow customers to smoke on their property, it’s none of the government’s business. If non-smokers don’t like it they can vote with their money and find somewhere else to do business.

    • More or less, that’s how I feel. There are things the government should not be involved in and this is one of them.

  • bobmontgomery

    The editorial in today’s paper was entitled ‘State Must Do More To Confront Our Poor Health’. The lead paragraph was “The abysmal condition of Hoosiers’ overall health is a statewide embarrassment, one that ought to prompt Gov. Mike Pence and other state leaders to take stronger action to change long-term trends.” In addition the ENTIRE FRONT PAGE of today’s paper consisted of articles about the need to exercise and be active and stay fit and all that jazz. Not the Lifestyles page or the Advice columns, but the ENTIRE FRONT PAGE of the newspaper (You don’t need to know about NYT lying about Benghazi, heheh).

    The short term reason for the health kick is of course to refocus away from Obamacare rationing to come, and to condition the public not to seek medical care, treatment, therapy, drugs, et cetera. The long term reason that the Talking points Memo keeps being issued is just overall, general, long-term conditioning of the folk to look for authority somewhere other than themselves.

    On a separate but related topic, the people of Connecticut, you will note, are being conditioned to stand in lines and tell the government where their guns are and how many they have. See, their RKBA is not being threatened. Heavens forbid! But the government needs to know so that when they die for lack of medical care, the government can come and pry their guns from their cold, dead hands. Before their heirs get there and claim what used to be rightfully theirs.

    • The trend of which you speak is more than a little troubling. Because it is so much easier for Americans to fall into line and allow the government to think for them, that’s what we are seeing. Somewhere along the line, they failed to understand that our Republic only works if the people participate in a real and meaningful way. Far too many of us have stopped doing that, thus we see how far we have moved away from the foundations on which America was established.

      I was not aware of what is happening in Connecticut. I’ll have to do some research and see what is going on.

  • I think you touched on the reason why the government is beginning to go after e-cigarettes and it all revolves around taxing. The government really is not interested in helping people to stop smoking, they simply want to tax people for their addiction. They know many smokers cannot quit and so they have a means of getting more tax money, people will smoke no matter how high taxes are raised. But e-cigarettes are helping people to quit and that means tax revenues are down, therefore the government is seeking to demonize e-cigarettes so they can begin to increase taxes on them.

    This is much like gasoline and more fuel efficient cars. The government does not care about the environment, they want more taxes but now that they have required cars to be more fuel efficient the revenue is down and that is why some states are beginning to look at taxing people for the miles they drive as well.

    • I can’t tell you the times in the past few weeks when I have heard news stories about a government, be it local, state, or federal, looking for ways to increase their revenue. Government tends to want to grow stronger. To do that, it has to have funds to feed its growth. Mark my words, it will not be long before e-cigarettes are taxed and regulated. All in the interest of public safety, of course.

  • Billiam

    I used them, e-cigs, for awhile. A nurse that the company I was driving for employed had said to be careful, as some of the chemicals in the emulsion were poisonous. She advised using the Nicotrol inhaler instead. As to the fact that they’re not taxed the same as real cigs, well, we all know the Government is NEVER satisfied with the amount of $$ it’s fed, and is always looking for ‘just one more helping’. They are also addicted to control over our lives, and that appetite, is never ending.

    • Did the nurse tell you what chemicals she was talking about? There seems to be a lot of information on both sides of the argument.

      As to the theory that the government is addicted, both to our tax dollars and to the amount of control they have over our lives, I concur completely.

  • Pingback: From Around the Blogroll | The First Street Journal.()

  • Billiam

    The nurse said that, especially in the Chinese made brands, there was a poison that’s in anti-freeze that can cause issues with certain internal organs. I guess it would depend on whether you’re using e-cigs to quit, or as a replacement. Prolonged exposure, and all that. Oh, and Happy New Year, Larry! Looking forward to another year of your writing..